Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Myths of Coil springs, spacers and tbar cranking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2003, 10:26 PM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Myths of Coil springs, spacers and tbar cranking

Over the couple years that I've been on the boards I've repeatedly run into some common misconceptions regarding coil spacers, tbar cranking, and preloading. For instance, a lot of people incorrectly think that adding spacers or cranking tbars add preload.

To dispell these myths I've put together an article that discusses basic suspension component functions and how simple modifications effect the system. Keep in mind that this is a basic look at suspension systems and there are many more things going on than I have explained. Also, this article focuses on coilover suspension but the theory transfers over to any coil sprung suspension and to torsion bars.

I welcome any comments, questions or suggestions you may have. Enjoy.

http://www.robinhood4x4.com/suspension1.htm
Old 12-17-2003, 10:33 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Bob_98SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
steve,

this is the most shameless plagarism of my original work. i hope you can live with yourself.
















(nice going steve! EXCELLENT stuff. this should be stickied, IMHO).

Bob
Old 12-17-2003, 10:38 PM
  #3  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Bob_98SR5
this is the most shameless plagarism of my original work. i hope you can live with yourself.
Hey, I briefly mentioned you at the bottom of the last page in really small print. Besides, you'll never be able to prove it...

Last edited by Robinhood150; 12-17-2003 at 10:45 PM.
Old 12-17-2003, 10:44 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
amusement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 12-18-2003, 04:51 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
transalper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not want to get into a debate about this, but i have been adjusting preload on motorcycles for years by using the adjustment nuts, just like on the SAWs. Increasing the preload by compressing the spring within the shock reduces the sag and raises the bike. Here's a pic from Ohlins that contradicts your definition of preload adjustment:

Are motorcycle shock manufacturers using the term differently than the automobile industry?
Old 12-18-2003, 07:32 AM
  #6  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yeah, I've noticed that about motorcycles. I think they're just using that term because it's an easy term to use for the general public and it gets the point across. However, it is a misnomer.
Old 12-18-2003, 10:29 AM
  #7  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Here's a better reason why it's called "preload adjustment."

Preload adjustment in the motorcycle world needs to be understood correctly so you don't missapply it here. You increase the ride height in anticipation of a heavier rider. The rider is the extra pre-load, the motorcycle does not gain weight. We call it a preload adjustment because we are compensating for the anticipated weight but it is important to distinguish between a larger person on a motorcycle and a truck that has not gained any weight and therefore preload.

I guess it's not really a misnomer.

And there's a good discussion going on at 4x4wire if all this is still confusing.

Last edited by Robinhood150; 12-18-2003 at 10:31 AM.
Old 12-18-2003, 11:16 AM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
TDiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Urbandale, IA
Posts: 7,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve,

Its mertzTr, not Er.

Hey, why are the numbers 9 and 5 offset in Bob's username? It looks like something an old typewriter would do.
Old 12-18-2003, 11:31 AM
  #9  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by mertztr
Steve,

Its mertzTr, not Er.

Hey, why are the numbers 9 and 5 offset in Bob's username? It looks like something an old typewriter would do.
Why you gotta be all different? Just pick an easy name like Pdiddy or somethin'.

Yeah, I typed out the whole article with my trusty typewriter and scanned in the pages. If you look really close, you'll see the pictures are actually done in ascii.
Old 12-18-2003, 02:03 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
cruizin01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon Ohio
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve thanks for that info. That cleared up some of the muddy water I had about "preload"

Not to go OT here but how does shock length affect the preload? Or do all systems used on toyotas use the same max. extend shock?
Old 12-18-2003, 02:39 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Flygtenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good show on the write up.

There is a difference in effect between the two sorts of spacers out of the coilover versus in.

Regarding cranking the torsion bars, it is good to be clear on what all the words mean and such, but the end result is that ride and travel suffer.

The discussion of spacers would create preload on an in the coilover spacer if the coils were progressive, right?

You are an engineer IIRC, so I will bow to your knowledge on this, just wanted to ask for that clarity.
Old 12-18-2003, 03:13 PM
  #12  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by cruizin01
Steve thanks for that info. That cleared up some of the muddy water I had about "preload"

Not to go OT here but how does shock length affect the preload? Or do all systems used on toyotas use the same max. extend shock?
Shock length doesn't affect the preload at all unless you are riding around fully extended or fully compressed everywhere you go. That certainly does not make for a comfy ride.

hmmm...just thought of something though...to elaborate on my explanation further it's not the shock length per se, but rather the physical travel limits of the suspension, be it the bumpstops, shock travel, or ball joint limits.

So let's imagine you do ride around with the travel always fully extended. When you add a spacer under this condition, then the spring IS compressed more than normal and thus the preload increases.
Old 12-18-2003, 04:34 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cruizin01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon Ohio
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Robinhood150
So let's imagine you do ride around with the travel always fully extended. When you add a spacer under this condition, then the spring IS compressed more than normal and thus the preload increases.
Thats exactly why Ive always been confused. Im pretty sure that my setup sets at the top of the shock for most of the ride. It seems to me that I compressed the coil so much to get the shock nut on that the weight of the truck isn't enough to compress the coil enough to let the shock "travel: Im sure I just dont understand part of the physics so just call me stupid if its appropriate.
Old 12-18-2003, 06:18 PM
  #14  
Contributing Member
 
BruceTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, many auto manufacturers do preload their springs, you can see this when you remove your stock coilover assy on your 4Runner. Where you'll need a spring compressor to dissassemble the unit.

Say your running SAW's on the front of your 4Runner, the springs are 650lb(a popular set-up). You can easily teardown your shock assembly without a spring compressor. Now you decide you want to run lighter springs, say 550. The problem is, if you get the same uncompressed length of springs as the 650, they will need to be compressed much further, to maintain the same ride height. Ideally you want to run as much spring as possible on your assembly and still allow for full compression. To offset this you buy longer springs, but now they won't fit unless you use a spring compressor for assembly, this would be considered preloading, but the overall initial load on the springs will be the same, reguardless of what weight spring is being used. The difference will be in the compressability of the springs, the lighter springs will compress easier. As for longevity of your springs the larger the diameter and more coils you can get away with, the longer they will last. this is due to the torsional effect the springs are put under. With larger coils the twisting is spread over a greater area.
Old 12-18-2003, 06:53 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
cruizin01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon Ohio
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
too...much...info....brain...cant...process....CRA SH!!!

So what would the effect be of using say 10" 650lb spring vs. a 12" 550lb spring. Wouldn't you be able to get the same lift but have more movement of the spring (up and down) resulting in a better ride? Or do the lighter springs just get compressed alot more resulting in the same ride? I hope I dont sound REALLY Stupid. I just want to understand the best I can.
Old 12-18-2003, 07:05 PM
  #16  
Contributing Member
 
BruceTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Real simple a 650lb spring compresses 1" for ever 650lb, it takes 1300 lbs to compress 2" etc. etc. now with a 550lb spring it will compress aprox 2.36" with 1300lbs, but the difference is the amount of weight needed to compress the next 1" of spring, it only takes 550lbs. By preloading the spring .36", you can achieve the same ride height as the heavier spring with the same loaded spring length.

Last edited by BruceTS; 12-18-2003 at 07:23 PM.
Old 12-18-2003, 07:26 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
cruizin01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon Ohio
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You cheater you edited it....Trying to confuse the crap out of me..no wonder I couldn't figure that sentence out..lol

Ok it makes a little more sense to me still muddy but I dont think there is a clear answer.
Old 12-18-2003, 07:39 PM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
BruceTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry about the edit job, forgot to proof read before posting. I'm trying to make it as clear as possible. Maybe I should have used a lighter spring in my example.

650 inch pound spring, takes 650 pounds to compress each 1" of spring, 1300 pounds to compress 2", 1950 pounds to compress 3" and 2600 pounds to compress 4".

550 inch pound spring, takes 550 pounds to compress 1". 1100 for 2", 1650 for 3", 2200 for 4" and 2750 for 5"

now it the total weight on that wheel was 2600 pounds, then with the 650 inch pound spring it would compress 4" whereas with a 550 inch pound spring would compress almost 5". But to compress an additional 1" of travel it would take another 650 pounds of force compared to 550 pounds of force with the lighter spring. I hope this clears the muddy water..............

Last edited by BruceTS; 12-18-2003 at 07:50 PM.
Old 12-18-2003, 07:54 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
cruizin01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon Ohio
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That part makes total sense to me. The part I dont get is say my coil is 650lb. and I have to compress it 3 inches to get it on the shock. Does it take 2600 lbs to compress the spring 1 more inch or is it still going to move 1 inch for every 650lbs that gets put on it?
Old 12-18-2003, 07:56 PM
  #20  
Guest
 
jruz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Myths of Coil springs, spacers and tbar cranking

Originally posted by Robinhood150
...incorrectly think that adding spacers or cranking tbars add preload...
But combined with the angle of the dangle of the rest of the IFS components they do (?) create preload...? Obviously these types of lifts cannot exist with the rest of the components (A-arms, balljoints, etc.), so in all fairness, they do increase this...?

I agree with your reasoning, just not quite with the conclusion...

Jim


Quick Reply: Myths of Coil springs, spacers and tbar cranking



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 AM.