Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

mpg ECT 'on' vs. 'off'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2003, 08:05 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kps36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mpg ECT 'on' vs. 'off'

Well , I just completed my scientific comparison of driving with the ECT in Power mode and Normal. I even went so far as to drive almost exactly the same every day ..A/C off in am, on in pm back and forth to work..only no excess miles .. used my son's for errands. And I even used the same pump at the same Gas station here (texaco..it's the cheapest 87oct.)

Results: Power mode 18.09 mpg
Normal mode 18.14 mpg

I would have thought the diff would be more..sooooo I guess I drive in Power mode all times now !!
Old 08-08-2003, 08:10 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
rimpainter.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice work. When I had an Auto, I drove with the ECT in power all the time too. Likewise, I didnt see much of a difference in MPG.
Old 08-08-2003, 09:08 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
HBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like ECT-on mode better too, I just don't like the light on the dash all the time. Makes me feel like something's broken. I think I should disconnect the light, then drive w/it on all the time.
Old 08-08-2003, 09:19 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
SLC Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HBoss that's the same thing I thought!


Before I bought the S/C I drove around with the ECT always on. Now I don't ever turn it on.
Old 08-08-2003, 09:26 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
russellcframe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
makes sense I think

Unless you're doing all stop and go driving, you'd be cruising in the same gears with or without ECT. So the fuel burn should be about the same. As I understand it all that ECT does is bump the shift pattern up so it will run higher RPM's before upshifting. So crusing really shouldn't be affected. I could be wrong though.
Old 08-08-2003, 10:28 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kps36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, I did leave that part out...It was ALL city driving. No extended cruising was involved. That's what surprised me so much...alot of shifting involved...
Old 08-08-2003, 04:18 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
kaiberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it comes down to how much you stomp on the gas...if your heavy footed naturally than the ECT tends to magnify the ammount of fuel wasted by quick starts etc...if your naturally moderate with the pedal than the ECT mode isnt going to change all that much much in the way of MPG's...having the power mode on in itself doesnt really have that much of an effect...it seems that when alot of guys turn it on though they tend to "gun" the engine a bit more thus they see a decrease in MPG's...

i always drive with it on...and always push hard with my right foot

by the way...russell...what part of WI you from ??
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ashamsuddin
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
01-13-2023 03:17 AM
Longbed 90
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
03-11-2019 12:38 PM
primordialbeast117
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
12-19-2015 12:23 PM
Longbed 90
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
27
10-19-2015 11:05 AM
Boomer8404
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-20-2015 06:15 PM



Quick Reply: mpg ECT 'on' vs. 'off'



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:34 PM.