Lifted folks: What MPG do you get on 33's/35's?
#1
Lifted folks: What MPG do you get on 33's/35's?
I was curious what gas mileage to expect if I decided to lift my 3rd gen 4runner.
Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Suggested Format:
=========================
[city gas mileage] / [highway gas mileage]
[2.7L] or [3.4L]
[lift (in)]
[gear ratio] or ["stock ratio"]
Comments:
[mention any mods you believe effect your gas mileage or anything else you'd like to share]
Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Suggested Format:
=========================
[city gas mileage] / [highway gas mileage]
[2.7L] or [3.4L]
[lift (in)]
[gear ratio] or ["stock ratio"]
Comments:
[mention any mods you believe effect your gas mileage or anything else you'd like to share]
Last edited by RothRunner; 09-01-2006 at 10:11 AM.
#2
Contributing Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16.5/18-19
3.4L
3in lift
stock ratio
285/75/16's yoko geo Ht/S (street tread)
isr/deckplate/trd sticker
(and yes that is using the correct miles to calculate)
3.4L
3in lift
stock ratio
285/75/16's yoko geo Ht/S (street tread)
isr/deckplate/trd sticker
(and yes that is using the correct miles to calculate)
#3
Contributing Member
There was the exact same thread like a month ago, I cant find it though.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
There was the exact same thread like a month ago, I cant find it though.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
#7
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: vansterdam BC.
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
-3.4L
-dont know exact mpg's since were in metric, but i get about 280-300km to a tank. about 99% city driving. only time i get more km/tank is when i drive the highway to go wheelin
-about 4" lift. 2.5-3 susp/1.5 body.
another thing that i find really kills my mpg is the arb bull bar. not the most streamlined thing, and add this to big off road 33"s...and well...mileage? whats that? wheres the next gas station?
-dont know exact mpg's since were in metric, but i get about 280-300km to a tank. about 99% city driving. only time i get more km/tank is when i drive the highway to go wheelin
-about 4" lift. 2.5-3 susp/1.5 body.
another thing that i find really kills my mpg is the arb bull bar. not the most streamlined thing, and add this to big off road 33"s...and well...mileage? whats that? wheres the next gas station?
Trending Topics
#8
Contributing Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
There was the exact same thread like a month ago, I cant find it though.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
#9
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im easy on the pedal now with my 33's so its around 17mpg at best in the city, 14 at worst (stop and go, city has been particularly bad due to that accident with the big dig)
highway is around 18ish.
highway is around 18ish.
#10
im getting about 14.5 but its mainly due to my rack
lift: 3 inchs, going on 5 with 2 inch bl
tires: 285/75/16 goodyear mtr
rack: yakima load warrior (it will kill your mpg)
lift: 3 inchs, going on 5 with 2 inch bl
tires: 285/75/16 goodyear mtr
rack: yakima load warrior (it will kill your mpg)
Last edited by neliconcept; 09-01-2006 at 12:39 PM.
#12
If I drive like an old lady I can get 21mpg on the highway. Normal city is 15-16mpg
285's
4.10 gears
4" overall lift
Looking at going to 4.56 when I do my lockers and hoping this gets a bit better.
285's
4.10 gears
4" overall lift
Looking at going to 4.56 when I do my lockers and hoping this gets a bit better.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3.4
4:30 gears
auto
~1.5" lift.
with 265's I was getting 20 on the hi-way and ~17 city, now with the 285's I seem to get about 18 hi-way and almost the same city, but because it's summer I'm also running the a/c now. I normally drive slow but I usually do at least one or two "floor it" a day. It helps to relax me.
4:30 gears
auto
~1.5" lift.
with 265's I was getting 20 on the hi-way and ~17 city, now with the 285's I seem to get about 18 hi-way and almost the same city, but because it's summer I'm also running the a/c now. I normally drive slow but I usually do at least one or two "floor it" a day. It helps to relax me.
#15
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
There was the exact same thread like a month ago, I cant find it though.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
Im getting 16-18 mpgs with 35's on hiway, and 14-16 city. 4.30 gears, 3.4l.
Last edited by Bighead; 09-09-2006 at 04:51 AM.
#17
On my 2003 hilux I have stock 4.1:1 gears, 5 speed manual, 3.4 V6, and I run 265/75x16 BFG A/T's (32" diameter) and the best average Ive got out of a tank of fuel is 12.8 litres per 100km (Australian measurement here), that should equate to 18.28 miles per gallon.
Would going to 4.56:1 ratio better my fuel economy or not? It would rev higher at 60mph wouldn't it?
Also, If I went 285's and the 4.56 gears, what would my economy be then?
Thanks for any help I may get.
Would going to 4.56:1 ratio better my fuel economy or not? It would rev higher at 60mph wouldn't it?
Also, If I went 285's and the 4.56 gears, what would my economy be then?
Thanks for any help I may get.
#18
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: vansterdam BC.
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not to hijack...but some questions and opinions to those with 35's, 4.30's, and 3.4l with ladymatics...assuming youve previously had 33's...
-was there a noticable power loss from the 35's? it was somewhat noticable going stock 265/70's to the 33's...but im over it now.
-how is it on the trail? too tall gearing wise? would it make a difference going to 4.56's? or if im gonna bother to regear...should i go 4.88's? i dont care if its a slug off the line and it'll probably kill my already bad mileage as it is. but how is the combo on the rocks?
much thanks
-was there a noticable power loss from the 35's? it was somewhat noticable going stock 265/70's to the 33's...but im over it now.
-how is it on the trail? too tall gearing wise? would it make a difference going to 4.56's? or if im gonna bother to regear...should i go 4.88's? i dont care if its a slug off the line and it'll probably kill my already bad mileage as it is. but how is the combo on the rocks?
much thanks
#19
Contributing Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not to hijack...but some questions and opinions to those with 35's, 4.30's, and 3.4l with ladymatics...assuming youve previously had 33's...
-was there a noticable power loss from the 35's? it was somewhat noticable going stock 265/70's to the 33's...but im over it now.
-how is it on the trail? too tall gearing wise? would it make a difference going to 4.56's? or if im gonna bother to regear...should i go 4.88's? i dont care if its a slug off the line and it'll probably kill my already bad mileage as it is. but how is the combo on the rocks?
much thanks
-was there a noticable power loss from the 35's? it was somewhat noticable going stock 265/70's to the 33's...but im over it now.
-how is it on the trail? too tall gearing wise? would it make a difference going to 4.56's? or if im gonna bother to regear...should i go 4.88's? i dont care if its a slug off the line and it'll probably kill my already bad mileage as it is. but how is the combo on the rocks?
much thanks