just test drove 05 Tacoma
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just test drove 05 Tacoma
Probably going to be a lot of these threads in the coming weeks, but here's mine...
2005 Tacoma
V6 Double Cab
Long Bed
TRD Sport Package
$30,322
Drove it about 15 miles... a brief stint on the highway, some around town stuff... some smooth roads, some time in pothole hell.
First Impressions:
It's a beautiful truck. Lines are sleek, but still fitting for a truck (except for the hood scoop ).
Interior is very comfy... seats are great, controls/steering wheel/dash/etc. is right where it should be.
Power was decent. Certainly better than my truck, but not what I was expecting. Powered right along, but was not quick. Will get you into traffic, but not exactly confidence inspiring. Power was definitely better from 50-80, but from 10-40mph it was not significantly different from my 8-year old truck on power sapping 33" MTs.
Ride quality was good. Took some getting used to though. I'm used to my super stiff suspension that doesn't soak up anything but also doesn't lean in turns. Initially I thought the truck felt huge because of the way it "wallowed' in the turns, but I quickly got used to it and thought the truck handled reasonably well for a stock truck and rode well. The Tacoma was smooth, felt pretty solid, and generally felt good.
Overall I liked it, but I was not wowed by it. I was very excited about the truck, and perhaps that's part of my problem, but it did not impress me. And for $30k, I expected to be impressed.
At this moment, I'm undecided about whether or not I want to buy one. I hope to get one for an extended test drive soon.
2005 Tacoma
V6 Double Cab
Long Bed
TRD Sport Package
$30,322
Drove it about 15 miles... a brief stint on the highway, some around town stuff... some smooth roads, some time in pothole hell.
First Impressions:
It's a beautiful truck. Lines are sleek, but still fitting for a truck (except for the hood scoop ).
Interior is very comfy... seats are great, controls/steering wheel/dash/etc. is right where it should be.
Power was decent. Certainly better than my truck, but not what I was expecting. Powered right along, but was not quick. Will get you into traffic, but not exactly confidence inspiring. Power was definitely better from 50-80, but from 10-40mph it was not significantly different from my 8-year old truck on power sapping 33" MTs.
Ride quality was good. Took some getting used to though. I'm used to my super stiff suspension that doesn't soak up anything but also doesn't lean in turns. Initially I thought the truck felt huge because of the way it "wallowed' in the turns, but I quickly got used to it and thought the truck handled reasonably well for a stock truck and rode well. The Tacoma was smooth, felt pretty solid, and generally felt good.
Overall I liked it, but I was not wowed by it. I was very excited about the truck, and perhaps that's part of my problem, but it did not impress me. And for $30k, I expected to be impressed.
At this moment, I'm undecided about whether or not I want to buy one. I hope to get one for an extended test drive soon.
Last edited by jacksonpt; 10-19-2004 at 10:38 AM.
#2
Contributing Member
Both the throttle and transmission are electronically controlled with adaptive AI. I found that after a few hours of "spirited" driving that the truck became noticeably quicker. It would spin it's TRD Off-Road Package tires from a standing start on dry asphalt to the point that TRAC kicked in. I drove a short bed that's only 45 lbs. lighter than a long bed, an insignificant difference. How did you like the turning radius? Ride quality?
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BT17R
Both the throttle and transmission are electronically controlled with adaptive AI. I found that after a few hours of "spirited" driving that the truck became noticeably quicker. It would spin it's TRD Off-Road Package tires from a standing start on dry asphalt to the point that TRAC kicked in. I drove a short bed that's only 45 lbs. lighter than a long bed, an insignificant difference. How did you like the turning radius? Ride quality?
Turning radius... didn't really notice it. I only drove around town, so I didn't really test it, but I didn't feel the lengthy wheelbase at all.
#4
Contributing Member
Thanks for the ride quality comments. I drove the Off-Road Package and thought the ride was soft but supple with a long travel suspension on both ends, a little moreso on the front. I didn't notice any wallowing, though. In fact I was impressed that on paved two-lane mountain twisties it was so stable once the suspension compressed. The specs indicate that the Sport Package is tuned more for on road ride and handling, so I wonder if you were feeling the effects of a wheelbase substantially longer than the short bed I drove?
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BT17R
Thanks for the ride quality comments. I drove the Off-Road Package and thought the ride was soft but supple with a long travel suspension on both ends, a little moreso on the front. I didn't notice any wallowing, though. In fact I was impressed that on paved two-lane mountain twisties it was so stable once the suspension compressed. The specs indicate that the Sport Package is tuned more for on road ride and handling, so I wonder if you were feeling the effects of a wheelbase substantially longer than the short bed I drove?
Again... after 10 minutes, I didn't notice it and, for the most part, enjoyed the ride.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLC Punk
Have you driven the Tundra with the VVTi V8 (2005)? If so, how do they compare with each other? For $30K, you are looking at Tundra DC SR5 TRD prices.
Trending Topics
#8
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info. So the V8 felt a lot stronger than the 4.0L... How would you say that 4.0L compares to the 3.4L Supercharged?
Sorry for all the questions, I really need to go and test drive them myself, but I just don't have time.
Sorry for all the questions, I really need to go and test drive them myself, but I just don't have time.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLC Punk
Thanks for the info. So the V8 felt a lot stronger than the 4.0L... How would you say that 4.0L compares to the 3.4L Supercharged?
Sorry for all the questions, I really need to go and test drive them myself, but I just don't have time.
Sorry for all the questions, I really need to go and test drive them myself, but I just don't have time.
I've never been in a SC 3.4, so I can't comment on that.
No problem with the questions... keep them coming - I'm happy to answer them as best I can.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drove the auto, so no comments on the 6speed.
I think technically they are still classified as a compact truck, but for all practicle purposes, it's a midsize IMO. The Tundra is going full size soon, so the Tacoma would fit nicely in the midsize market. Not sure what Toyota's plans are for the FTX though.
I think technically they are still classified as a compact truck, but for all practicle purposes, it's a midsize IMO. The Tundra is going full size soon, so the Tacoma would fit nicely in the midsize market. Not sure what Toyota's plans are for the FTX though.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wv4runner
Damn....$30k for Toyota's entry model truck. I hope I'm more impressed than you when I drive it, especially for that money.
#16
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jacksonpt
That's the kicker for me... I wouldn't have any problem spending $30k on the Tacoma - it's that nice. But for $33ish, I can get a similarly equipped Tundra...
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLC Punk
Same here. After I went and looked at one, I would spend $30K becuase it is really nice. But I could have a V8 Tundra (which would pull my boat better) for a tad bit more.
#18
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jacksonpt
EXACTLY! For me, the draw to a tundra is the V8 and getting a bit more truck for basically the same money. The draw to the Tacoma is that it's faaar more comfortable (IMO) and the gas mileage is better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
04-11-2024 04:39 PM
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
07-14-2020 08:35 PM
itzmywife's
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
07-25-2015 04:55 PM
Poncho0206
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
07-10-2015 06:21 PM