Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Curb weight, 4runner vs. Tacoma?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2004, 09:31 AM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Mad Chemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curb weight, 4runner vs. Tacoma?

Anybody know how the weight of a 3rd gen 4runner compares to the same year Tacoma?

Thank-ee Sai!
Old 02-13-2004, 09:34 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
rwmorrisonjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home: Aurora, CO; Work: The People's Republic of Denver
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd do a quick search on Toyot's web site, they have all the info there. The Tacoma will be lighter, but not sure by how much.
Old 02-13-2004, 09:48 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Curb weight, 4runner vs. Tacoma?

Originally posted by Mad Chemist
Anybody know how the weight of a 3rd gen 4runner compares to the same year Tacoma?

Thank-ee Sai!
I know my truck weighs 3370. I think the Toyota web site has the specs.

It depends on what model Tacoma you mean too. Mine is the base 2.7L.

Last edited by GRNTACO; 02-13-2004 at 09:50 AM.
Old 02-13-2004, 10:12 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 4Runners ranged from 3,740 (SR5 2WD) to 4,115 (Limited 4WD) lbs.

2000's ranged from 3,440-3,975

1996 Limited 4WD's were 3,925



2002 3.4L Tacomas Xtracabs: 3,355 (2WD) to 3,540 (4WD)

2002 3.4L Double cabs: 3,475 (2WD) to 3,705 (4WD)




More 2000-2002 Toyota info here.

Last edited by Darren; 02-13-2004 at 10:33 AM.
Old 02-13-2004, 01:15 PM
  #5  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Mad Chemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm....I almost expected there to be a greater difference. I'm curious for people driving the 2.7L tacoma's whether they feel they have enough power (especially any body running stock gears and 33" tires).
Old 02-13-2004, 01:27 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mad Chemist
Hmmm....I almost expected there to be a greater difference. I'm curious for people driving the 2.7L tacoma's whether they feel they have enough power (especially any body running stock gears and 33" tires).
Here is how I looked at it. My trucks weight is 3290 (toyota web site weight) and I have 177lb torque so that gives me 18.6lb of torque per pound of truck. The 3.4 x-cab is 3540lb @ 220lb torque so that gives you 16lb torque per pund of truck. So I think the 2.7 will do better with the 33's and I will let you know how the 33's and 4.88s do next week
Old 02-13-2004, 02:06 PM
  #7  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18.6 is worse power to weight ratio than than 16



Think about it: (2.7L) 18.6 pounds of weight for every ft/lb torque available vs. (3.4L) 16 pounds of weight for every ft/lb of torque.
Old 02-13-2004, 02:11 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4RUNR
18.6 is worse power to weight ratio than than 16



Think about it: (2.7L) 18.6 pounds of weight for every ft/lb torque available vs. (3.4L) 16 pounds of weight for every ft/lb of torque.
No, 18.6ft/lb of torque per pound of truck. There is 18.6ft/lb per pound of truck. So 18.6ft/lb is better than 16ft/lb anyday of the week. Check your division.

Last edited by GRNTACO; 02-13-2004 at 02:13 PM.
Old 02-13-2004, 02:15 PM
  #9  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your math is right , logic is not
Old 02-13-2004, 02:19 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't argue there.
Old 02-13-2004, 03:19 PM
  #11  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here, lets do it together:

If you divide weight of the car by available ft/lb of torque you have

weight
---------
ft/lb



2.7L

3290lb
---------- = 18.6lb
177ft/lb

So you have 18.6 lbs of weight FOR EVERY unit of torque available.

Corvette 5.7L

3116lb
----------- = 7.79lb
400ft/lb

Less is better And that why the 3.4L has more power to weight than the 2.7L.
Old 02-13-2004, 03:25 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4RUNR
Here, lets do it together:

If you divide weight of the car by available ft/lb of torque you have

weight
---------
ft/lb



2.7L

3290lb
---------- = 18.6lb
177ft/lb

So you have 18.6 lbs of weight FOR EVERY unit of torque available.

Corvette 5.7L

3116lb
----------- = 7.79lb
400ft/lb

Less is better And that why the 3.4L has more power to weight than the 2.7L.
Well I'm a horses ass.

I knew I should have bought the 3.4L

I'll shut up now.

Have a nice day:cry:
Old 02-13-2004, 03:35 PM
  #13  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at it more positively. It's only ~14% difference in power.

Now the Corvette...
7.8
18.6

Old 02-13-2004, 03:49 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4RUNR
Look at it more positively. It's only ~14% difference in power.

Now the Corvette...
7.8
18.6

I put 4.88 gears with 31X10.5 and that was a 20% difference from stock so does that make up for any of the 14%

EDIT: I think my math sucks but how do you get a 14% difference?

Last edited by GRNTACO; 02-13-2004 at 04:03 PM.
Old 02-13-2004, 04:30 PM
  #15  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18.6 is ~15% greater than 16, though it's not indicative of much since we are dealing with peak torque figure which is different from everyday driving.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msane99
Pre 84 Trucks
6
07-11-2015 08:08 PM
akaphilly
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
0
07-09-2015 02:18 PM
AaronM
Items Wanted
0
07-08-2015 07:15 PM
God's Bounty Hunter
Pre 84 Trucks
6
07-08-2015 12:54 PM



Quick Reply: Curb weight, 4runner vs. Tacoma?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 PM.