Which LS accessory drive fits better?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Which LS accessory drive fits better?
For front-to-back motor length, the corvette has the shortest accessory drive available. The camaro/firebird crank pulley is shorter than the truck and the corvette is even shorter than that.
Magpede's L33 fits in his '91 pickup with a corvette accessory drive. Note the alternator up top on driver side.
Will the camaro accessory drive also fit between the rails just as well, even though it has the alternator and PS pump switched?
Lots of LS accessory drive info here and here is the motor I'm trying to use, which already has a camaro setup on it:
Magpede's L33 fits in his '91 pickup with a corvette accessory drive. Note the alternator up top on driver side.
Will the camaro accessory drive also fit between the rails just as well, even though it has the alternator and PS pump switched?
Lots of LS accessory drive info here and here is the motor I'm trying to use, which already has a camaro setup on it:
#2
Registered User
For front-to-back motor length, the corvette has the shortest accessory drive available. The camaro/firebird crank pulley is shorter than the truck and the corvette is even shorter than that.
Magpede's L33 fits in his '91 pickup with a corvette accessory drive. Note the alternator up top on driver side.
Will the camaro accessory drive also fit between the rails just as well, even though it has the alternator and PS pump switched?
Lots of LS accessory drive info here and here is the motor I'm trying to use, which already has a camaro setup on it:
Magpede's L33 fits in his '91 pickup with a corvette accessory drive. Note the alternator up top on driver side.
Will the camaro accessory drive also fit between the rails just as well, even though it has the alternator and PS pump switched?
Lots of LS accessory drive info here and here is the motor I'm trying to use, which already has a camaro setup on it:
The brackets aren't factory, they're from kwik performance.
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
Definitely helps. Like I said I have the Camaro setup as my starting point. I'm quite ready to drop the AC compressor off of the passenger side if I start having clearance issues, but it looks like I'll be lucky to make out so easily.
#5
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may be able to get away with running the camaro accessories and it will probably eliminate the chance of running your thermo on the engine side of the radiator if you wanted to go that way. LS2/3 will give you a fair bit more clearance. Running that on mine and theres around 10mm clearance between the balancer and the 16" thermo I'm using
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
You may be able to get away with running the camaro accessories and it will probably eliminate the chance of running your thermo on the engine side of the radiator if you wanted to go that way. LS2/3 will give you a fair bit more clearance. Running that on mine and theres around 10mm clearance between the balancer and the 16" thermo I'm using
Do you have a build thread anywhere?
#7
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got a bit of a build thread here. Seems as though a few of the pics have disappeared though. I'm in Australia so everything is opposite hand which was good in some ways and not in others. No bashing of firewall for clearance but it meant a lot of mucking around to make a clutch master cylinder work. My radiator is just a cheap ebay 4Runner aftermarket item which seems to do the job. Its mounted as far forward as possible and give me about 10mm clearance to the fan.
My only complaint with the conversion is the short 5th gear in the R150 tranny which I'm thinking is the cause of the not so great fuel economy. I'm currently looking into doing the dyna 5th gear swap but I think i'll run into problems like a few others have with the earlier transmission.
http://toyotasurf.asn.au/forum/viewt...p?f=32&t=22540
My only complaint with the conversion is the short 5th gear in the R150 tranny which I'm thinking is the cause of the not so great fuel economy. I'm currently looking into doing the dyna 5th gear swap but I think i'll run into problems like a few others have with the earlier transmission.
http://toyotasurf.asn.au/forum/viewt...p?f=32&t=22540
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mapemberton12
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
8
12-08-2015 05:40 PM