TomkiRider

Waht kinda mileage have u guys been getting after a 3.4 swap?

__________________
94 x-cab, 33x12.5 good year wranglers, 3.0 v6 5 spd, 3 inch pro comp lift

mt_goat

I've been getting about the same as I did with the 3.0 (15-16 mpg) but I'm driving much faster (cruising 70-75mph). My truck weighs a little more now too. I haven't tried driving slow yet, I didn't swap in a supercharged 3.4 so I could drive like grandma.

__________________
Dale

"America is in a hole and it's getting deeper every day. We import 70% of our oil at a cost of $700 billion a year - four times the annual cost of the Iraq war." T. Boone Pickens
Check out the plan: http://www.pickensplan.com/index.php and http://www.cngnow.com/EN-US/Pages/default.aspx

TomkiRider

huh. i think im gettin a little more than that with my 3.0 but then again it is a bigger engine

__________________
94 x-cab, 33x12.5 good year wranglers, 3.0 v6 5 spd, 3 inch pro comp lift

mt_goat

You have a 5 speed too, that helps.

__________________
Dale

"America is in a hole and it's getting deeper every day. We import 70% of our oil at a cost of $700 billion a year - four times the annual cost of the Iraq war." T. Boone Pickens
Check out the plan: http://www.pickensplan.com/index.php and http://www.cngnow.com/EN-US/Pages/default.aspx

RobD

Right now, I'm pulling around 450-475 kms per tank, which usually runs about 55 liters. For you non-metric types, that works out to around 19-20 mpg. I'm running a 5 speed with 33s, stock gearing.

__________________
1991 4Runner, 3.4 5VZFE swap, OME shocks/springs, 33" BFG All Terrain T/A KOs, Pioneer head unit, Infinity speakers, XM Satellite radio

breknraj

I see about 19-20 mpg on my truck - far better than the 14-15 I was getting with the 3.0.

__________________
Raj : 1960 Homo Sapien. 192cm, Blonde, Blue. Soon to lose spare tire.

Worf : 1990 SR5 Xtracab 4x4 5 speed, Inca Red Metallic. 3.4 converted, with Taco 5 spoke alloys, 275/65R16 BFG AT K/Os. Soon to add rear e-locker.

JGrund85

I would like to say that I knew, but my truck is still in the shop...anyone got one running 35's with 5.29 gearing??

__________________
91' 4Runner, 3.4L swap, SAS, 4" front 5" rear trail gear lift, 5.29's, detroits front and rear, sliders, 1st gen roll bar, Longfields, Addicted Offroad front winch bumper, 35x12.50x15 Mickey Thompson Baja MTZ's

mt_goat

You guys in high elevations will always get better mileage due to less wind resistance. Other considerations are how fast you drive, 55mph is better than 75mph. Also don't forget some stations are now selling blends of ethanol which gets less mpg too, some won't even tell you either.

__________________
Dale

"America is in a hole and it's getting deeper every day. We import 70% of our oil at a cost of $700 billion a year - four times the annual cost of the Iraq war." T. Boone Pickens
Check out the plan: http://www.pickensplan.com/index.php and http://www.cngnow.com/EN-US/Pages/default.aspx

breknraj

Hey, Dale!

Although they might not tell you directly, the stations here in Colorado are required to tag the pumps with a sticker stating how much ethanol is in the fuel. All I have ever seen is 10% on standard gas pumps. It started out as a seasonal thing, but I believe that they run E10 year round, now.

The altitude certainly helps with our milage figures, but I can't say that I take it very easy on the truck on drives back and forth to Denver, and such. The 3.4 is just that much more efficient at producing its power (and I don't have the S/C, either). I would have to attribute most of that gain to the far better ignition system on the 3.4. The modified COP set up is WAY better than the distributor/coil ignition.

__________________
Raj : 1960 Homo Sapien. 192cm, Blonde, Blue. Soon to lose spare tire.

Worf : 1990 SR5 Xtracab 4x4 5 speed, Inca Red Metallic. 3.4 converted, with Taco 5 spoke alloys, 275/65R16 BFG AT K/Os. Soon to add rear e-locker.

mt_goat

That's good, wish they did that here. I suspect that most are now 10% here because it lowers the price. It may be hard to find pure gasoline now.

__________________
Dale

"America is in a hole and it's getting deeper every day. We import 70% of our oil at a cost of $700 billion a year - four times the annual cost of the Iraq war." T. Boone Pickens
Check out the plan: http://www.pickensplan.com/index.php and http://www.cngnow.com/EN-US/Pages/default.aspx

X-AWDriver

Higher elevation usually comes with lots of hill and mountain passes plus our vehicles produce less power making them work harder so our gas mileage isn't really any better overall and I'm getting the same as the flat landers do.

__________________
'99 4Runner Highlander 4wd
E-locker,rear diff and deckplate mod * 265/75/16 Nitto TerraGrapplers * Yakima Load Warrior rack * clear corners/signals * Tacoma skidplate * Silverstar lamps/fogs
Alpine CDA-9831,Bazooka EL Series 250w amp,MTX 10" sub

mt_goat

The best mileage I ever got was in Colorado in the 6000-8000 elevation range.

__________________
Dale

"America is in a hole and it's getting deeper every day. We import 70% of our oil at a cost of $700 billion a year - four times the annual cost of the Iraq war." T. Boone Pickens
Check out the plan: http://www.pickensplan.com/index.php and http://www.cngnow.com/EN-US/Pages/default.aspx

Elvota

I think about 16 or just more. About 4 mpg better on average than with the 3.0. My 4Runner has lot's of armor, winch, bumpers and all that jazz. Overall I am still really happy with the swap. More power and more range.

I am, but I think 4.88's might work better with 35's and the 3.4. I think my revs would drop for hwy driving and increase my MPG.

Then again, I kind of have an excuse to go 37's next time.

__________________

1990 4Runner | V6 3.4 | 5spd | 240 someoddthousand miles | SR5 | SAS | RLS | 35's | ARB | TJM | 217 to 1 | W8000

- four wheels | three sticks | two hands | one trail -

Wheelingnoob

I was considering doing a 3.4 swap for the power and the millage increase but I'm already getting 19mpg on the hwy with my 3.0, so maybe this will just be a power thing