toyota frame
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
toyota frame
I have a 94 Toyota single cab short bed. what frames are compatible as replacements
Last edited by dropzone; 11-08-2012 at 04:12 AM.
#6
For the most part. But there are some significant differences between years.
Of note, 84-88 frames have the last 2 body(bed) mount holes at the rear drilled in a different location than 93-95 frames. I don't have any information on where those holes would be on a 89-92 frame, but I'd assume they'd be the same as 93-95(since the body style changed in 89, and remained essentially the same through 95).
Notice the location of the rear body mounting holes labeled J and j on the 88 4WD regular cab SWB PU frame below. And their distance from holes H and h(H-J or h-j) as 314mm(12.36")
Notice those same holes and their relative distances from each on the 93 4WD regular cab SWB PU frame below. H-J/h-j is +100mm comparitively, at 414mm(16.30")
So any similar model 84-95 regular cab SWB PU frame should work(even if you had to drill a couple new body(bed) mount holes). But I've also noticed that the horsecollar crossmembers look different between 84-88 and 93-95. The exhaust mount and e-brake cable bracket aren't identical. What difference that might make...I don't know.
It's also worth mentioning that if the frame's not from a model with the same engine, it's probably not going to have the same transfer case crossmember(since the transfer case usually isn't the same for a 4 cyl. and a V6). But you could swap your old crossmember to another frame(if it's still good).
Of note, 84-88 frames have the last 2 body(bed) mount holes at the rear drilled in a different location than 93-95 frames. I don't have any information on where those holes would be on a 89-92 frame, but I'd assume they'd be the same as 93-95(since the body style changed in 89, and remained essentially the same through 95).
Notice the location of the rear body mounting holes labeled J and j on the 88 4WD regular cab SWB PU frame below. And their distance from holes H and h(H-J or h-j) as 314mm(12.36")
Notice those same holes and their relative distances from each on the 93 4WD regular cab SWB PU frame below. H-J/h-j is +100mm comparitively, at 414mm(16.30")
So any similar model 84-95 regular cab SWB PU frame should work(even if you had to drill a couple new body(bed) mount holes). But I've also noticed that the horsecollar crossmembers look different between 84-88 and 93-95. The exhaust mount and e-brake cable bracket aren't identical. What difference that might make...I don't know.
It's also worth mentioning that if the frame's not from a model with the same engine, it's probably not going to have the same transfer case crossmember(since the transfer case usually isn't the same for a 4 cyl. and a V6). But you could swap your old crossmember to another frame(if it's still good).
Last edited by MudHippy; 11-08-2012 at 10:40 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MMA_Alex
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
25
04-18-2017 05:07 AM
steve miller
General Electrical & Lighting Related Topics
2
10-10-2015 01:40 AM
FS[SouthEast]: 1st Gen 4Runner Slider Window, Driver Side
coryc85
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
0
07-06-2015 04:07 AM