Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

EB 268 VS Stock cam shaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2010, 05:36 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pettybilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Waxhaw NC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EB 268 VS Stock cam shaft

Hey guys, was wondering who is running the eb 268 cam, i put one in my 87 4 runner, however the rpm range seems very narrow. I have heard some guys going back to the stock cam after putting in a aftermarket one. The engine seems to fall on its face after 3000 rpm, you guys runnig he 268 notice the same thing? Don't get me wrong, this thing runs great, just seems a bit lazy after 3000.

Thanks Doug
Old 03-04-2010, 06:44 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake City, Fl
Posts: 12,248
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
sounds like the RPM range it was designed intentionally to work at it's made for lower RPM torque (I think )

my 261 is happy from about 1500 to about 4500




Last edited by iamsuperbleeder; 03-04-2010 at 06:55 PM.
Old 03-04-2010, 06:48 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
camo31_10.50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vian, OK
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the 261* was designed for low end grunt...the 268* was designed for higher end (Ted himself told me this) so you have something wrong lol

my 261* is good up until about 4500 as well LOL!!!! it's a nice cam
Old 03-04-2010, 06:55 PM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake City, Fl
Posts: 12,248
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
well wth, how much more could you want out of a 22re than 4500 RPMs?



lol
Old 03-04-2010, 06:59 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
toyota4x4907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: middle of no where Alaska
Posts: 4,355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
116 hp at 4800rpm
Old 03-04-2010, 07:06 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
marsbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mundelein, IL
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love my 261 from EB. I spent a bunch of time on the phone with Ted, and he pointed me towards this instead of the other one. In combination with his Street RV head, I'm getting roughly 21 mpg city and closer to 25ish highway (haven't done too much of that yet) but, on the large hills outside of Salt Lake, I hardly ever need to get out of 4th on the LONG (15 mile) climbs. You seem to get the best performance from this with -7* timing. Also, with about 650 lbs in the bed of my runner, it still out accelerates a few of the other stock 22re's in the area
Old 03-06-2010, 02:40 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pettybilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Waxhaw NC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well thanks for the replies, i think i figured out some of my problem, turns out that i was'nt getting any mechnical advance. So after getting that working, the truck runs much better. Sounds like most of you guys are running the 261 over the 268, its sounds like its a better cam from off idle.

Thanks again, Doug
Old 03-07-2010, 03:50 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pettybilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Waxhaw NC
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks gNARLS


Doug
Old 03-07-2010, 05:13 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Gnarly4X
Here's some data to argue over.....

Running Conditions: Barometric Pressure=29.76, Intake Air Temp=80d F, Dew Point=37d F, Elevation=1,000 ft., Coolant Temp=195, Fuel Octane=87

22RE – Stock, Doug Thorley header, opened exhaust (2” to 2.25”)
EB261C – Duration @ .050” = 222, Valve Lift .410”, 110d Lobe Center, Valve Lash = .008/.008
1200 RPM – 85.2 brake tq, 19.5 brake HP
1400 RPM – 93.7, 25.0
1600 RPM - 102, 31.2
1800 RPM - 109, 37.3
2000 RPM - 118, 44.9
2200 RPM – 129, 53.9
2400 RPM – 136, 61.9
2600 RPM - 142, 70.3
2800 RPM - 147, 78.3
3000 RPM - 150, 85.7
3200 RPM – 151 brake tq, 91.8 brake HP
3400 RPM – 150, 96.9
3600 RPM – 144, 98.9
3800 RPM - 140, 101
4000 RPM - 136, 104
4200 RPM – 132, 106
4400 RPM – 129, 108
4600 RPM - 127, 112
4800 RPM - 127, 116
5000 RPM - 125, 119
5200 RPM – 122, 121
5400 RPM – 117, 120
5600 RPM – 109, 116

22RE – Stock, Doug Thorley header, opened exhaust (2” to 2.25”)
EB268 D=218, Lift=.425”, LC=110, VL=8/8
1200 RPM – 88.8 brake tq, 20.3 brake HP
1400 RPM – 97, 25.9
1600 RPM - 106, 32.1
1800 RPM - 112, 38.3
2000 RPM - 121, 46.1
2200 RPM – 132, 55.2
2400 RPM – 139, 63.3
2600 RPM - 145, 71.6
2800 RPM - 149, 79.3
3000 RPM - 150, 85.9
3200 RPM – 150 brake tq, 91.4 brake HP
3400 RPM – 148, 96.1
3600 RPM – 143, 98.3
3800 RPM - 140, 101
4000 RPM - 136, 103
4200 RPM – 132, 106
4400 RPM – 129, 108
4600 RPM - 128, 112
4800 RPM - 128, 117
5000 RPM - 125, 119
5200 RPM – 120, 119
5400 RPM – 114, 118
5600 RPM – 107, 114

22RE – Stock, Doug Thorley header, opened exhaust (2” to 2.25”)
EB270 D=222, Lift=.430”, LC=110, VL=8/8
1200 RPM – 82.2 brake tq, 19.5 brake HP
1400 RPM – 93.5, 24.9
1600 RPM - 102, 31.1
1800 RPM - 109, 37.3
2000 RPM - 118, 44.8
2200 RPM – 129, 53.8
2400 RPM – 135, 61.9
2600 RPM - 142, 70.2
2800 RPM - 147, 78.2
3000 RPM - 150, 85.6
3200 RPM – 151 brake tq, 91.8 brake HP
3400 RPM – 150, 96.8
3600 RPM – 144, 99
3800 RPM - 141, 102
4000 RPM - 137, 104
4200 RPM – 133, 106
4400 RPM – 130, 109
4600 RPM - 128, 112
4800 RPM - 128, 117
5000 RPM - 126, 120
5200 RPM – 123, 122
5400 RPM – 118, 122
5600 RPM – 111, 118

22RE – Stock, Doug Thorley header, opened exhaust (2” to 2.25”)
Putney Machine 230-440 D=230, Lift=.440”, LC=110, VL=8/8
1200 RPM – 78.2 brake tq, 17.9 brake HP
1400 RPM – 87.1, 23.2
1600 RPM - 96, 29.3
1800 RPM - 104, 35.5
2000 RPM - 111, 42.7
2200 RPM – 123, 51.5
2400 RPM – 129, 59.1
2600 RPM - 136, 67.2
2800 RPM - 143, 76
3000 RPM - 147, 84.2
3200 RPM – 150 brake tq, 91.1 brake HP
3400 RPM – 150, 97
3600 RPM – 145, 99.7
3800 RPM - 141, 102
4000 RPM - 137, 105
4200 RPM – 133, 107
4400 RPM – 130, 109
4600 RPM - 127, 112
4800 RPM - 127, 116
5000 RPM - 126, 120
5200 RPM – 125, 124
5400 RPM – 122, 126
5600 RPM – 117, 125

22RE – Stock, Doug Thorley header, opened exhaust (2” to 2.25”)
Toyota Stock Cam D=210, Lift=Int .398”, Lift Exh=.385”, LC=110, VL=8/10
1200 RPM – 95.6 brake tq, 21.8 brake HP
1400 RPM – 103, 27.6
1600 RPM - 112, 34
1800 RPM - 117, 40.2
2000 RPM - 127, 48.3
2200 RPM – 137, 57.4
2400 RPM – 143, 65.5
2600 RPM - 148, 73
2800 RPM - 150, 79.7
3000 RPM - 150, 85.6
3200 RPM – 149 brake tq, 90.9 brake HP
3400 RPM – 146, 94.8
3600 RPM – 142, 97
3800 RPM - 138, 99.7
4000 RPM - 134, 102
4200 RPM – 131, 105
4400 RPM – 129, 108
4600 RPM - 128, 112
4800 RPM - 124, 113
5000 RPM - 118, 112
5200 RPM – 112, 111
5400 RPM – 106, 109
5600 RPM – 98.4, 105

CC252S (2002 catalog): LC=110, D=204/204, Lift=410/410, LS=110, VL=10/10
1200 RPM – 99.3 brake tq, 22.7 brake HP
1400 RPM – 107, 28.5
1600 RPM - 115, 34.9
1800 RPM - 120, 41.1
2000 RPM - 129, 49.1
2200 RPM – 139, 58.2
2400 RPM – 145, 66.2
2600 RPM - 149, 73.6
2800 RPM - 150, 79.7
3000 RPM - 149, 85.3
3200 RPM – 148 brake tq, 90.3 brake HP
3400 RPM – 146, 94.6
3600 RPM – 141, 96.5
3800 RPM - 137, 99.3
4000 RPM - 134, 102
4200 RPM – 131, 105
4400 RPM – 129, 108
4600 RPM - 129, 113
4800 RPM - 123, 112
5000 RPM - 116, 111
5200 RPM – 110, 109
5400 RPM – 104, 107
5600 RPM – 96.5, 103

22RE – Stock, DT header, opened exhaust
CC252S (new Catalog): LC=110, D=214/214, Lift=420/420, LS=110, VL=10/10
1200 RPM – 92.3 brake tq, 21.1 brake HP
1400 RPM – 100, 26.7
1600 RPM - 108, 33
1800 RPM - 114, 39.1
2000 RPM - 124, 47.2
2200 RPM – 135, 56.3
2400 RPM – 141, 64.6
2600 RPM - 147, 72.6
2800 RPM - 149, 79.7
3000 RPM - 150, 85.9
3200 RPM – 150 brake tq, 91.3 brake HP
3400 RPM – 147, 95.5
3600 RPM – 143, 97.9
3800 RPM - 139, 101
4000 RPM - 135, 103
4200 RPM – 132, 106
4400 RPM – 130, 109
4600 RPM - 129, 113
4800 RPM - 129, 117
5000 RPM - 123, 117
5200 RPM – 117, 116
5400 RPM – 111, 115
5600 RPM – 104, 111


*****************

PEAK TORQUE @ RPM RANKING
EB 261C: 3200 RPM – 151, peak tq, 91.8 HP - 5200 RPM – 122 tq, 121 peak HP
EB 270: 3200 RPM – 151, peak tq, 91.8 HP - 5200 RPM – 123 tq, 122 peak HP
Put440: 3400 RPM – 150, peak tq, 97.0 HP - 5400 RPM – 122 tq, 126 peak HP
EB 268: 3200 RPM – 150, peak tq, 91.4 HP - 5000 RPM – 125 tq, 119 peak HP
CC252S-210: 3200 RPM – 150, peak tq, 91.3 HP - 4800 RPM – 129 tq, 117 peak HP
Toyota Stock: 3000 RPM - 150, peak tq, 85.6 HP - 4800 RPM – 124 tq, 113 peak HP
CC252S-204: 2800 RPM - 150, peak tq, 79.7 HP - 4600 RPM – 129 tq, 113 peak HP


PEAK HP @ RPM RANKING
Put440: 3400 RPM – 150, peak tq, 97.0 HP - 5400 RPM – 122 tq, 126 peak HP
EB 270: 3200 RPM – 151, peak tq, 91.8 HP - 5200 RPM – 123 tq, 122 peak HP
EB 261C: 3200 RPM – 151, peak tq, 91.8 HP - 5200 RPM – 122 tq, 121 peak HP
EB 268: 3200 RPM – 150, peak tq, 91.4 HP - 5000 RPM – 125 tq, 119 peak HP
CC252S-new: 3200 RPM – 150, peak tq, 91.3 HP - 4800 RPM – 129 tq, 117 peak HP
CC252S-old: 2800 RPM - 150, peak tq, 79.7 HP - 4600 RPM – 129 tq, 113 peak HP
Toyota Stock: 3000 RPM - 150, peak tq, 85.6 HP - 4800 RPM – 124 tq, 113 peak HP
lol you still need to send me those program files. Also isnt the VL settings 7 and 9 on the 268?
Old 03-07-2010, 06:00 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
camo31_10.50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vian, OK
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
WTH do you mean "look bigger"...???

and that's VERY interesting with the cams there Gnarly...i still don't know why Ted told me that the 268* was better at high RPM than the 261*...and the 270* was even higher..lol..kinda weird
Old 03-07-2010, 06:01 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
camo31_10.50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vian, OK
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
and ted recommends that the VL be set at 7/9 on my 261* however i have no clue if its different for the 268* or not
Old 03-07-2010, 06:22 AM
  #12  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
mightymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: high ridge
Posts: 1,756
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
it's the same for the 268 as well 7/9!
Old 03-07-2010, 06:27 AM
  #13  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
mightymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: high ridge
Posts: 1,756
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Also to add, My 268 performs flawlessly and i have no problems with it. My truck pulls better on the highway and has plenty of off line grunt. The major difference is when installing a cam like the 268 or 261 it needs to work well with a combination of other upgrades like exhaust and intake along with oversized valves and although marginal a better flowing head such as the lcengineering or rv head. I have all of these and can honestly say my truck runs like a champ.
Old 03-07-2010, 06:42 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Gnarly4X
Can you show me where the valve lash is spec'd 7/9 on the 268?

If you tighten the lash, it will make the cam "look bigger".

gNARLS.
7 an 9 is what ENGNBLDR told me, as well as it was listed on the box the cam came in. What do you look bigger?
Old 03-07-2010, 06:45 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
also you have listed 8 and 10 for the factory cam I am showing in the FSM as 8 and 12.
Old 03-07-2010, 06:47 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
am am thinking of trying the 261 as this thing dont seem to have any balls whatsoever 1500-2000 rpm. could be a gearing problem (4:10's w 31's) or could be because I had the block shaved 10 thousands and its a cam timing issue. (no adj cam gear)
Old 03-07-2010, 06:54 AM
  #17  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
mightymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: high ridge
Posts: 1,756
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
7/9 is what ted told me as well. I on the other hand, have mine at .008 intake and .010 exhaust. I know not much difference but i tried both and the factory spec and this is the one that gave me the best results on idle and performance. When set at .008 and .012 the cam rattled pretty good so i toyed with it and ended up there.
Old 03-07-2010, 08:05 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
dfarr67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Edson, AB, Canada
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have the new cc252, I bought more for an updated design and fuel economy and was afraid of going over the line as no cam Comp has is for the 22re. I have to say the truck runs good and it's not like there a significant difference in hp. I tried 12/12 to break in, then 10/10 as per specs but the intakes were noisy, then 8/10, and finally 8/12 for now- feel better torque on the highway.
Old 03-07-2010, 08:21 AM
  #19  
Contributing Member
 
olharleyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Name:  DSCN4024.jpg
Views: 1841
Size:  115.5 KB

Just to clear things up about the intake and exhaust adjustment of the 268 as for how it works well here is how I see it or better yet feel it at 3200 miles since rebuild.

SET UP
268 cam Paired with a L.C.Engineering Pro Street head with the over sized valves and stiffer springs , tri y header from DOWNEY OFF ROAD , block bored 20 over , 82 SUPRA AFM , 5.29 gears and 5 speed with a MARLIN CRAWLER 1200 lb clutch kit and 35 x 12.5 x 15 KM's

ON THE ROAD
If you ever had people pass you and look at you like why are you on the road then you will love this set up.
I have people constantly looking in their rear views and moving out of the way and no I don't tailgate or ride their bumpers I just hold a steady pace with them and they seem to be shocked that a lifted 4runner like mine can keep pace with them at 65-80 mph and roll in the fast lane.

I can pretty much go where I want to on the road and at most any speed up to 90 mph for sure , never tried to go faster then that and it never misses a beat and will tack up to 5400 pulling all the way.

OFF ROAD
This set up works as well off road as on road , the bottom end grunt that it has is nothing less then IMPRESSIVE. There is not one point where there is a drop off or hesitation from off idle to full throttle when needed on hills it is hard to find a weak link in the power bandband. It flows so nice and you hardly even notice any shifts in power between gear shifts and harder yet to find anything to slow you down or stop you , including pulling out other trucks or heeps.

MY OVER ALL IMPRESSIONS
The 268 cam from ENGNBLDR has everything you need top end wise for on road daily drivers with oversized tires to the bottom end grunt for oversized set up off road and not a single point where you will be disipointed through the powerband on either side of the spectrum.
If you have the means and time to build a motor set up similar DO IT.
One thing I would say is if I had it to do over I would go with the ENGNBLDR head set up. LCE and ENGNBLDRs heads are so close in specs that it is really not an issue but $1049 L.C.E. and an extra $100 for 268 once you relize the cam that comes with it really is not much help until you hit 3000 rpm with it vs $558 ENGNBLDR for the head and cam combo makes a big difference and can lead to more parts when rebuilding or keeping your budget in check.
Old 03-07-2010, 08:55 AM
  #20  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
bend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 287
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Interesting stuff on the 268 cam. I always thought it was the other way around.


Quick Reply: EB 268 VS Stock cam shaft



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 AM.