Any drawbacks to 33x9.5R15s?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Any drawbacks to 33x9.5R15s?
This relates to my 4Runner (different weight vehicles need different width tires). The 31x10.5s really don't work so well on ice and snow. If fact they kind of suck. I'm thinking of going to a 9.5" tire instead to increase the ground contact psi. The way I see it, it is easier to control the size of the footprint (thus contact psi) with a 33x9.5" tire. (Recall that most of the tire foot print size gained my airing down comes from tread length not width. I urge you not to reply saying that your 12.5" wide tires are great on shallow snow/ ice, the laws of physics would prove you wrong.) Also, if you do not own 33x9.5 tires, please rea this article first: http://www.expeditionswest.com/equip...bfg_mt_km.html
Last edited by Matt16; 12-13-2008 at 11:12 PM.
#2
Registered User
Not only do wider tires look cool, they are amazing on ice, i dont know what you are talking about, the bigger the tire the better. LOL jk.
I have some 30x9.5R15 Mudcat M/Ts (same tread pattern as BF Goodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM) on my 94 runner haha. Got em for $100 for all 4, 50% tread left.
Id say go for it, narrow tires for the win.
I have some 30x9.5R15 Mudcat M/Ts (same tread pattern as BF Goodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM) on my 94 runner haha. Got em for $100 for all 4, 50% tread left.
Id say go for it, narrow tires for the win.
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
Trending Topics
#9
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
I've run both 9.50s and 10.50s, both on 6" rims. I actually prefer the 10.50s, but the 9.50s work well, too. Only two downsides I had to the 9.50s was they would not air down as far as the 10.50s. Much below about 10 psi and the center of the tread buckles upwards and the tire actually lose traction. The 10.50s don't seem to do this, perhaps related to the tire vs. rim width. Also I find the 9.50 sidewalls tend to lay over a lot easier on side hills than the 10.50s. But for driving in wet snow, slush and ice, the skinny 9.50s perform well.
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Opinion noted and disregard. Do they teach reading in Kansas?
Last edited by Matt16; 12-12-2008 at 06:55 PM.
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Not only do wider tires look cool, they are amazing on ice, i dont know what you are talking about, the bigger the tire the better. LOL jk.
I have some 30x9.5R15 Mudcat M/Ts (same tread pattern as BF Goodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM) on my 94 runner haha. Got em for $100 for all 4, 50% tread left.
Id say go for it, narrow tires for the win.
I have some 30x9.5R15 Mudcat M/Ts (same tread pattern as BF Goodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM) on my 94 runner haha. Got em for $100 for all 4, 50% tread left.
Id say go for it, narrow tires for the win.
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
I've run both 9.50s and 10.50s, both on 6" rims. I actually prefer the 10.50s, but the 9.50s work well, too. Only two downsides I had to the 9.50s was they would not air down as far as the 10.50s. Much below about 10 psi and the center of the tread buckles upwards and the tire actually lose traction. The 10.50s don't seem to do this, perhaps related to the tire vs. rim width. Also I find the 9.50 sidewalls tend to lay over a lot easier on side hills than the 10.50s. But for driving in wet snow, slush and ice, the skinny 9.50s perform well.
#15
Registered User
#16
Registered User
My main concern with the 33x9.5s is limited availability. I looked at them last year and the only ones who made that size is BFGoodrich. The tire dealer told me that they were discontinuing that size because everyone wants big fat tires and not pizza cutters.
Just my 3 cents.
Just my 3 cents.
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
My main concern with the 33x9.5s is limited availability. I looked at them last year and the only ones who made that size is BFGoodrich. The tire dealer told me that they were discontinuing that size because everyone wants big fat tires and not pizza cutters.
Just my 3 cents.
Just my 3 cents.
The 1997 front wheel drive (open diff) VW van we had with 205/65R15 snow tires did about as well in snow (considering respective ground clearances) as my rear locked 4wd 4Runner. Granted the VW had snow tires, but the 4Runner has 2 more drive wheels (3 vs. 1 drive wheel). Whereas the 205/65r15 tires seemed to dig down to something worth gripping, the 31x10.5s seem to be quite content to turn the packed snow to ice.
Once must also take into account the frontal area of the tire when going through deeper snow.
Last edited by Matt16; 12-12-2008 at 10:04 PM.
#18
Registered User
#19
Registered User
Snow tires will ALWAYS work better on snow than all-seasons/terrains or pretty much anything else.
When I had snow tires on my mk1/2/3 jettas (I've had a bunch of vws over the years) I could outrun almost anyone in the city when it snowed. Easily outrunning awd wonders like subies and whatnot that were on all seasons.
That said, we'll see how well my 33x10.5 km2's feel this winter on the pickemuptruck.
When I had snow tires on my mk1/2/3 jettas (I've had a bunch of vws over the years) I could outrun almost anyone in the city when it snowed. Easily outrunning awd wonders like subies and whatnot that were on all seasons.
That said, we'll see how well my 33x10.5 km2's feel this winter on the pickemuptruck.