Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

3.0 interference motor?

Old 03-22-2008, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ernest t bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Point Loma, California
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.0 interference motor?

is the 3.0 v6, 89 to 95 an interference motor?

if the timing belt snaps will it smack valves?

what is the replacement interval?
Old 03-22-2008, 09:35 PM
  #2  
Donny, you're out of your element
Staff
iTrader: (23)
 
DeathCougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 17,689
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
No, it is not an interference engine.

I would suggest to replace the belt every 75k
Old 03-22-2008, 09:37 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
thook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Posts: 8,656
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
No and no and approx. every 60k miles.

The 22r series motors were/are interference. If your timing belt snapped, all it would do is quit running. And, 60k is what's recommended, but lots of folks go further than that with no problems. You just have to inspect it every so often. That still doesn't speak for the timing belt pulleys and tensioner, though. They can last for a very long time....several times longer than a belt. Just depends on how old your present ones as to when they'd need replacing. Even then, inspection is the thing to do.

Last edited by thook; 03-22-2008 at 09:39 PM.
Old 03-23-2008, 10:36 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
4x4phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What year 3.0 are the same?
I want to know what year parts will fit my 90?
Old 03-24-2008, 11:33 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Matt16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
All 3VZE (3.0L V6 in Toyota trucks) are basically the same. Maybe some differences in vacuum line routing and emissions stuff, but the timing belt is the same (1988?- 1995)
Old 03-24-2008, 11:56 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
dieselloco427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Matt16
All 3VZE (3.0L V6 in Toyota trucks) are basically the same. Maybe some differences in vacuum line routing and emissions stuff, but the timing belt is the same (1988?- 1995)
I there is one difference - but not too big - the timing belt is tensioned by a hydraulic tensioner instead of a spring on some years. I think 1993+. Just an fyi...
Old 03-24-2008, 12:08 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
mr_schuster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dieselloco427
I there is one difference - but not too big - the timing belt is tensioned by a hydraulic tensioner instead of a spring on some years. I think 1993+. Just an fyi...
Good call... I was just trying to think of something different.
Old 03-24-2008, 02:48 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
thook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Posts: 8,656
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
There are differences....pre 90's... in throttle body styles, distributor design, and...I believe from every one to two years even through the 90's....on switch and sensor connectors. I don't know specifics, though. Too much to keep up with...lol.

If your planning a switcheroo, you'll just have to compare and decide what to keep from the original and what to replace/splice in from the donor. When I swapped a motor from an '89 into my '92, I just ended up with the block from the '89. The head assemblies fit, but since the PO/rebuilder of the '89 messed up the heads in a couple of different ways, I went back to the top end from my '92.

As I recall, the main difference was in TB and distributor design. Probably...on the TB, anyway...because the motor was out of a 5spd and the '92 is an auto with cruise control. So, my '92 TB had an additional dashpot and the TPS connectors were different. The injectors were the same, the ECT sensor was the same, but the sensor cluster housing on the manifold was different.

As I said, too much to keep up with...engh.
Old 04-06-2008, 07:24 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
dieselloco427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, back to the subject of interference... I read somewhere that If the heads were milled down too far that valves could be bent because there would not be enough "space" for them to open up if the belt snapped or the timing was off...
Old 04-06-2008, 07:28 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Team420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: the great Maine wilderness
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dieselloco427
well, back to the subject of interference... I read somewhere that If the heads were milled down too far that valves could be bent because there would not be enough "space" for them to open up if the belt snapped or the timing was off...
they would have to be shaved a lot, could happen tho
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Littlerick
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
6
09-10-2015 08:57 PM
93toyoguy
Newbie Tech Section
10
08-02-2015 07:41 PM
80Truck
Pre 84 Trucks
8
07-24-2015 03:12 PM
tobylab
Diesel Swaps
0
07-17-2015 06:51 PM
Coreyr384
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-10-2015 11:13 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 3.0 interference motor?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:08 AM.