Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

1992 3.0 4WD smog trouble.

Old 06-01-2015, 11:50 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
outdoors_andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1992 3.0 4WD smog trouble.

Hello all. I'm having trouble getting my 92 3.0 to pass smog. It passed 2 years ago with flying colors after a complete engine rebuild, but doesn't seem to want to cooperate this year. These are the stats:

First try:
15mph
HC-127 max 314gp 127 meas- pass
CO-.55 max 2.08gp 0.08 meas- pass
NO- 721 max 1822gp 683 meas- pass

25mph
HC-75 max 264gp 40 meas- pass
CO- 0.69 max 2.29gp 0.04 meas- pass
NO- 623 max 1622gp 2133 meas- fail, gross polluter

I did a full tune up, and threw on a new catalytic converter to boot. A fair chunk of change, but that's what the mechanic recommended. Feeling confident, I went back for a retest, and promptly failed again. These are my numbers after the new Cat.

15mh
HC- 127 max 314gp 37 meas- pass
CO- .55 max 2.08gp 0.01 meas- pass
NO- 721 max 1822gp 1066 meas- FAIL

25mph
HC- 75 max 264gp 18 meas- Pass
CO- .69 max 2.29gp 0.01 meas- Pass
NO- 623 max 1622gp 1704 meas- FAIL!

I'm a little confused as to why my 15mph numbers went up after the new Cat, and wondering what I should do next. My first thoughts are towards a new upstream O2 sensor and new EGR valve, but I would love any advice as to what I might be missing. First step tomorrow is to check all the vacuum lines and run some cleaner through the old girl. The truck runs incredibly well, gas mileage is top notch, and I'm somewhat mechanically inclined, but far from a pro. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Old 06-02-2015, 08:33 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
scope103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 8,250
Likes: 0
Received 820 Likes on 648 Posts
The EGR system controls your NOx numbers. That's what it does. That's all it does!

Well, yes, the Cat has some impact on NOx, and if your O2 sensor is way off you could end up running so lean that the cat is overwhelmed, but usually that causes HC and CO to go nuts.

So I'm 99% sure your problem is somewhere in the EGR system, so that's where I'd start looking first. http://personal.utulsa.edu/~nathan-b...77exhaustg.pdf

One thing to consider with our "older" vehicles is "crud" on the EGR tube that goes into the plenum. The PCV system sprays gunk onto that tube, and if bad enough it can actually block it (and lots of other stuff in the plenum). So your EGR valve and modulator might be working correctly, but nothing is getting into the intake.

(BTW, California (and I think Canadian) vehicles have an EGR gas temperature sensor to catch just this problem. (With no flow into the intake, the temp. won't rise.) Is yours a 'Federal' vehicle?)
Old 06-02-2015, 05:41 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
outdoors_andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I took the EGR valve off and checked the lines, they didn't appear to be clogged. Went ahead and installed a new EGR, drove it around for a while, then went in for a retest. These are the new numbers after the new Cat and EGR vlave.

15mph-
HC- 127max 314gp 21meas -pass
CO- .55max 2.08gp 0.01meas -pass
NO- 721max 1822gp 1137meas -fail

25mph-
HC- 75max 264gp 3meas -pass
CO- .69max 2.29gp 0.01meas -pass
NO- 623max 1622gp 1813meas -fail, gross polluter

My numbers are actually getting worse. The only other thing I can think of is the EGR temp sensor, and after that I'm not terribly knowledgable on emissions. My funds are limited to the work I can do myself, and right now I'm stumped.
Old 06-02-2015, 07:46 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
YotaWoRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: BFE
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the 50 thousand feet of vacuum line routed correctly? Lol
Old 06-02-2015, 08:38 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
outdoors_andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They'd better be. I chased them around today and replaced some that looked worn.The truck runs great and I have no problem with gas mileage, there's never been a CEL since I've had it and I keep up on maintainence. It's got new plugs, wires, filters, oil, premium gas, new Cat, new EGR valve, even a new gas cap. I'm running out of ideas. I had a big leaky 95 Suburban with the exhaust cut off at the muffler that I beat to hell, and it never failed smog.
Old 06-03-2015, 05:27 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
scope103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 8,250
Likes: 0
Received 820 Likes on 648 Posts
Did you actually test the modulator and EGR valve? Replacing parts without testing them can get expensive quickly. The link I provided gives some tests. If the modulator is not working (or if any of the vacuum lines are not working correctly) the EGR won't be do anything.

Since you seem to be "getting worse," a quick acid-test is to put vacuum on the EGR valve actuator at idle; it should produce a noticeable idle change (it might even kill the engine).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
defrag4
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
07-31-2015 10:50 AM
Coreyr384
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-10-2015 11:13 AM
Roger Borba II
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-09-2015 05:05 PM
timmJ
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-07-2015 02:01 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1992 3.0 4WD smog trouble.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 AM.