YotaTech Forums - View Single Post - Hard on for turbochargers?
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2007, 08:59 PM   #32 (permalink)
j-man
Registered User
 
j-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asha'man View Post
Four cylinder cars are generally easier to turbo rather than supercharge, as they typically don't make all that much power to begin with and so can't spare very much to lose turning the blower. V6 and V8 engines can, so they're more frequently used for supercharged applications. Don't get me wrong, though, turbos on 6 and 8 (and greater) cylinder motors make huge power as well. My buddy's '86 Saleen made 425rwhp/450rwtq on a non-intercooled T44 at 8 psi.

Personally I've got a total hardon for turbos. I have a turbo Mustang and would love a turbo setup on the 4Runner. I much prefer turbo whistle and BOV hiss over blower whine, and the way turbos work just makes more sense and seems tougher to me. No, those are not scientific opinions, but that's how I feel.
i agree. Im sure we could all debate about who likes what and for different reasons, but ill tell you that on the 3.4, the difference between the turbo setup and the trd supercharger are huge; the turbo smokes the supercharger on all levels hands down.
__________________
2000 4Runner v6 sr5 4x4 5spd: Turbo'ed
99 4Runner v6 Sr5 4x4 5spd: Saw's / OME combo TrueTrac rear
98 4Runner V6 Sr5 4x4 5spd E-locker: Saws / OME combo... EEZI AWN Roof Tent 1.4m
97 4Runner V6 Sr5 4x4 Auto: Saws / OME combo TrueTrac rear
2003 Landcruiser 285 BFG At's and outback roofrack
My Baja Trailer Build: http://forum.ih8mud.com/showthread.php?t=179520
http://community.webshots.com/user/bajaroadtrain
j-man is offline   Reply With Quote